Send us a request and we will contact you as soon as possible.
Regulators are tightening their control over collective-investment vehicles in numerous jurisdictions. Although the names vary from market to market, the general pattern is the same: before a fund can begin operations, managers must complete a comprehensive authorisation process. The approval procedure for Unit Funds, Closed-End Unit Funds and Alternative Funds is usually lengthy, document-heavy and governed by strict formal rules. Market participants frequently underestimate the amount of paperwork, internal regulations, technical compliance, and audit details that are necessary. A deeper comprehension of the particulars of each fund type reduces the number of review cycles that the authorities initiate and helps prevent delays.
You can also take a look at information about how to create an investment fund in Luxembourg or UAE.
It tends to be quite laborious to get a license for an investment fund, but the outcome is that the fund can operate legally, penetrate regulated markets, and gain entry to institutional counterparties. One key underpinning for this is the confidence of participants. Their data reporting, rule on asset valuation, and risk-control measures are all subject to periodic control by state bodies.
Once authorization is received, a fund may proceed to the custodial and audit services, cross-border distribution channels, and tax arrangements of a region. In a more general sense, having to go through a formal approval process means managers have to establish a more orderly internal organization in respect to oversight, handling of assets, and disclosures. This helps reduce operational disputes and aligns the fund with modern expectations of reliability and predictability.
A Unit Fund, often known as a mutual-type product in various countries, pools contributions from individuals and organizations, forming a diversified pool of assets managed by a dedicated company. Participants receive units, while the managing body directs resources toward securities, property, cash instruments or other allowed categories. Most UIFs are open-ended, meaning that participants can request redemption of their units.
For a UIF to receive an official permit, authorities typically request:
A ZPIF differs in structure. Contributions are made only during the pre-determined formation period, and units are not redeemed until the end of the term. With no redemption pressure, long-horizon strategies around real estate, private enterprises, infrastructure, start-ups, and other long-term projects unsuitable for frequent cash-out events are possible.
Typical characteristics include:
An AIF sits in its own category. These structures pursue non-traditional approaches — hedge-style operations, early-stage technology, digital-asset portfolios, distressed debt, mixed real-asset baskets and other higher-risk directions. Many AIFs deal exclusively with seasoned participants who understand complex strategies and can navigate volatility.
Key features often cover:
Eli Deal assists clients throughout all procedural stages related to obtaining official authorization for UIF, ZPIF and AIF structures. Our work includes:
Obtaining a formal permit is an extensive process that requires thorough planning and complete documentation before any UIF, ZPIF or AIF can be approved. The result, however, is the ability to operate legally, attract contributors and execute strategies in a structured environment. In view of the complexities of today’s oversight practices, professional support becomes less of a choice. Eli Deal will help to minimize procedural risks and keep the managing body attuned to the rules that are evolving. In order for any group to enter into this segment, early preparation and a methodical approach will be a very critical part of long-term operational continuity.
It is necessary to form a managing organization, draft the fund papers, select and appoint service providers, send materials to the regulator, undergo regulatory assessment, receive approval and launch.
The course of action is similar to getting an AIF permit. You need to create a managing organization, draft the fund papers, select and appoint service providers, send materials to the regulator, go through regulatory assessment, receive approval and launch.
A fund is usually classified as an AIF when it collects assets from several participants, pools these assets into a collective structure, and manages the pool according to a defined policy, operated by an external or internal manager, not regulated as a UCITS-type retail fund.
Regulators anticipate that an AIF will have a management structure that is practical, with defined roles and documented protocols for routine operations, risk management, and valuation. The fund requires a clear set of rules outlining its daily operations, decision-making process, and investor entry and exit procedures. Along with simple procedures for identity verification, record-keeping, and frequent reporting, supervisors also seek independent oversight of asset custody. The fund is typically regarded as fulfilling the minimal demands for approval if these fundamental structural elements are present.
There have been numerous changes in the regulatory framework of New Zealand in the last ten years. Largely, it has been to the conduct and outcomes in the sector. Although, this has made the environment quite complex for firms to navigate, thus increasing operational burdens and costs. Overlapping demands, multiple authorizations, and detailed adherence obligations…
The fiscal sector in New Zealand is regulated by a sturdy supervisory structure put in place to act as a protective cover for the investor and ensure a well-functioning trading environment. The requirements for providing investment products and giving monetary advice are set out in the FMCA and its related rules, enforced by the FMA….
In these last years, Gambling concept in Malta has seen a total sea transformation into one of the most respected, solid, and incontrovertibly complete adjustment frameworks for the worldwide iGaming industry. It has managed to establish itself clearly as a prime international operational hub pertinent to people who seek stability, transparency, and market access guarantee….
At the moment, Argentina has a rigid, formal corporate control system. The individual designated to oversee and sign on behalf of the business cannot serve as a figurehead for new investors. Authorities anticipate that someone with legal standing in the nation and the capacity to make actual decisions will occupy this position. Errors at this…
Resolution 3/2026 was made public by the Argentinean UIF earlier this year, 2026. It’s a pack of measures related to the behavior that any executor of the obligated markets need to follow with regards to operations linked to international restriction lists and the flow of prohibited weapon technologies. It doesn’t introduce a whole new tier…
General Resolution 5804/2025 was released by the Argentine Ministry of Justice in the Official Gazette at the end of 2025. The document appeared narrow and technical at first. In actuality, it modifies the collection and transmission of financial data linked to digital platforms to the tax authority. The act grants the ARCA more power to…
Lithuania has reinforced its position in the evolving European crypto regulatory landscape by granting two new crypto-asset service provider licences under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). The approvals were issued to CoinGate, operated by UAB Decentralized, and to Nuvei Liquidity, UAB. The decision highlights Lithuania’s increasingly selective approach to crypto regulation and reflects a…
In 2026, crypto-currency taxation is evolving globally and yet rapidly in a streamlined manner. Although digital assets are treatable as property eligible for taxation or financial instruments in most nations, still a larger number of countries strictly enforce zero taxes and bestow a minimal tax rate on crypto. These countries have emerged as the best…
AEMI licence is a permit issued by the UK Financial Conduct Authority to operate as an authorised electronic money institution. This status allows firms to issue electronic money, provide a wide range of payment services and conduct transactions comparable to basic banking functions, with exception of lending and accepting deposits. In practice, AEMI is often…
Electronic money issuer licence in Europe is a permit released by the national financial regulator of a European Union member state to issue electronic money and offer related payment services. It allows you to officially work with electronic balance accounts, issue prepaid products, open customer accounts and make payments within the EU and EEA through…
Payment institutions are a cornerstone of modern Europe’s economy. They facilitate the transfer of money between people and businesses, in particular the receipt of card payments, operation of online wallets, and delivery of digital financial services without necessarily engaging the services of a full-fledged bank. On the other hand, a common set of rules does…
Permission to operate is the first step in any online gambling project. Not branding, not traffic, not design. The platform operates outside of the legal economy in the absence of a state-issued gaming license. This one element is necessary for payments, partnerships, advertising, and financial infrastructure access. Licensing is frequently viewed by founders as supporting…