The International Trademark System in Madrid

Published:
February 4, 2021
startup 849804 1920

Trademark rights are distributed geographically. The system of Madrid jurisdiction is an economical and convenient enough solution to register and manage a trademark from anywhere in the world. The system of international registration of trademarks, adopted in Madrid, offers owners of certain brands the opportunity to apply a trademark and protect its uniqueness and autonomy through a single procedure, using one language and paying a single set of state fees.

Key benefits of the Madrid system

Companies operating internationally can benefit from the following advantages of the Madrid system:

  • simplified procedure for filing documents, which helps to significantly save money;
  • all administration processes are optimized and registered centrally, updated and supported in the same way;
  • application and communication is done in the language of the candidate’s choice (Spanish, English or French offered);
  • there are no requirements for the appointment of local representatives;
  • there is no need to comply with any documentary formalities, for example, draw up a power of attorney;
  • the geographic protection of an international mark can be extended at any time. New designations can be added as soon as they may be needed within the commercial interest of the owner;
  • limited inspection period, which is fixed at 1 year or 18 months;
  • that the owner of the mark can designate the European Union as an IR would be an ideal way to protect the trademark within the EU. The IR system makes it possible to convert an EU designation into a designation used at the national level in each of the states not subject to objection. This is a much less burdensome and complex mechanism than converting a mark by filing an application with the appropriate authorities.

The main disadvantages of the system adopted in the Madrid jurisdiction

  • State compliance. The Madrid jurisdiction system is not a substitute for the local legal framework for trademarks. The mark also cannot circumvent local requirements, for example, in the United States a demonstration of continued use of the trademark is required before it can be registered.
  • Centralized attack. International registration is subject to the original application or registration within five years from the date the international registration was made. The original application or registration of most New Zealand trademark owners will be considered their application or trademark registration. In the event that the original application is unsuccessful or the initial registration is canceled, the international registration will also terminate. However, there is a provision regarding the transformation of rights under an international registration into a single national application.
  • Narrowing of the granted rights. The dependence of the international registration on the original application implies that any restrictions that apply to the main trademark may affect the rights granted to the owner in the designated states in some way.
  • Property rights. The international registration of the original trademark is unaffected by changes in ownership. Thus, the documentation relating to the change of ownership of a mark must contain the necessary guarantees from the new owner so as not to jeopardize the cancellation or prohibition of the international registration.

How many countries can you embrace? At the discretion of the owner. Depending on the countries required, the cost of filing an application for registration of a national trademark may be slightly more expensive or cheaper. In addition, for some symbols, the more stringent requirements of the Protocol apply in comparison with national requirements.

Will the trademark usage be the same for every country? IR does not change to use each designation, but it is possible to restrict services or goods to some extent to the jurisdiction of a particular country.

What states can you designate? Some jurisdictions offer a greater vulnerability to a right acquired through IR than to a right obtained through national registration. That is why, it is better to refuse to use a universal strategy for registration. Instead, it would be more expedient for companies to resort to the Madrid system, taking into account all its advantages, including lower costs and greater efficiency, which is important for protecting the mark in world markets.

Please note that after Brexit, the UK is no longer designated as the EU on the IR application.

Related insights

Exploring the Pros and Cons of Shelf Companies in the UK

Perhaps you relish a thought of starting a business in Great Britain. Then, buying a shelf company could be the first thing coming to your head. Being already incorporated, such “ready-made firms” have never been used. They’re waiting for their owner who can put them to work. It could be you.  For some entrepreneurs, such…

Read more 13.10.2025

New Swiss AML Rules 2025: Key Points You Need to Know

Switzerland has always been known for its stable and investor-friendly financial system. Nevertheless, for the last time, this country has been facing constant international pressure to make sure that the country’s financial strength is not used illegally for money laundering and terrorist financing. For nearly ten years, Swiss watchdogs have made a number of tweaks…

Read more 02.10.2025

Crypto License: Best Countries for Cryptocurrency Broker License & Registration

A solid legal foundation is essential in the world of digital assets. A crypto license is a key part of building a trusted business, and as rules become clearer, choosing the right jurisdiction is the first critical step. Many entrepreneurs look for a crypto exchange license for sale to accelerate their market entry. This guide…

Read more 02.10.2025

Legal Structures in Switzerland: Which Fits Your Business Model Best?

Starting a business in Switzerland gives you access to the safe and prestigious market. The first stage in choosing a legal settlement in this country is to decide the suitable legislative structures. This election dictates your fiscal liability, tax status, and daily operations. It sets the course for the future of your firm. While most…

Read more 30.09.2025

How to Choose the Best Canton: A Practical Guide to Swiss Taxation

The country’s unusual political organization grants its 26 cantons significant latitude over their tax laws. This generates a competitive marketplace in which there can be wide disparities in tax rates from one jurisdiction to another. Anyone wishing to live, work or invest in the country needs to know about these! Where you settle down is…

Read more 29.09.2025

Top 9 Countries With Best Offshore Bank Accounts For 2025

The current offshore banking model continues as a very effective measure for the security, diversification, and investment of wealth on a global scale. Extending an off-shore account in the right jurisdiction will provide benefits that range from greater privacy to tax benefits and access to a wide array of acquisition possibilities, depending upon whether one…

Read more 29.09.2025

FCA Work Programme 2025–2026: Key Priorities and Outlook

The Financial Conduct Authority, also dubbed FCA for short, plays a major role in shaping the British financial system. Its work program sets out the regulator’s priorities as well as its long-term strategy on an annual basis. For 2025–2026, the watchdog focuses on technology-driven oversight, stronger consumer protection, and also financial stability in a rapidly…

Read more 25.09.2025

UK Company Bank Accounts with Foreign UBOs: Key Success Factors

Opening a British company bank account has always been an object of interest for firms willing to build trust, access local clients, and also operate trouble-free in the European Union. However, there might be one difficulty. When the ultimate beneficial owners are represented by foreigners, the process can turn daunting. Being under strict regulatory pressure,…

Read more 22.09.2025

Best Countries in Europe to Obtain an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) License

In fact, the establishment of an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) can be a very wise move for the many fintechs out there searching for regulated access to the payments market of the EU/EEA with full passporting rights. The regulator of each country might have a totally different perspective on timelines, scrutiny, supervisory style, and post-licensing…

Read more 22.09.2025

UAE Free Zone or Mainland License? Choosing the Right Path for Your Business in 2025

When it comes to setting up a business, the UAE is right there among the world’s best. The vision of the emirates as a conduit to markets across the Middle East, Africa, and Asia has for time out of mind drawn entrepreneurs and investors alike—from Dubai’s bustling financial districts to the strategic global connections of…

Read more 22.09.2025

Puerto Rico IFE/IBE Update & Overview

Puerto Rico is one of the few US regions that offers an organized offshore banking structure with meaningful tax incentives. There are two routes available IFE and IBE. They give access to a 4 % tax rate and dividend exemptions for owners from abroad. Nevertheless, these two permits are created for diverse purposes and are…

Read more 16.09.2025

St. Kitts and Nevis: Your Premier Tax Haven in 2025

Nowadays, St. Kitts and Nevis is considered one of the most appealing places for protection of belongings and wealth structuring. The governmental body continues to maintain a low-regulation monetary environment and a steady regulatory climate for businesses for sale. Over the past ten years, it has quietly become a popular place for international companies to…

Read more 16.09.2025