The International Trademark System in Madrid

Published:
February 4, 2025
startup 849804 1920

Trademark rights are distributed geographically. The system of Madrid jurisdiction is an economical and convenient enough solution to register and manage a trademark from anywhere in the world. The system of international registration of trademarks, adopted in Madrid, offers owners of certain brands the opportunity to apply a trademark and protect its uniqueness and autonomy through a single procedure, using one language and paying a single set of state fees.

Key benefits of the Madrid system

Companies operating internationally can benefit from the following advantages of the Madrid system:

  • simplified procedure for filing documents, which helps to significantly save money;
  • all administration processes are optimized and registered centrally, updated and supported in the same way;
  • application and communication is done in the language of the candidate’s choice (Spanish, English or French offered);
  • there are no requirements for the appointment of local representatives;
  • there is no need to comply with any documentary formalities, for example, draw up a power of attorney;
  • the geographic protection of an international mark can be extended at any time. New designations can be added as soon as they may be needed within the commercial interest of the owner;
  • limited inspection period, which is fixed at 1 year or 18 months;
  • that the owner of the mark can designate the European Union as an IR would be an ideal way to protect the trademark within the EU. The IR system makes it possible to convert an EU designation into a designation used at the national level in each of the states not subject to objection. This is a much less burdensome and complex mechanism than converting a mark by filing an application with the appropriate authorities.

The main disadvantages of the system adopted in the Madrid jurisdiction

  • State compliance. The Madrid jurisdiction system is not a substitute for the local legal framework for trademarks. The mark also cannot circumvent local requirements, for example, in the United States a demonstration of continued use of the trademark is required before it can be registered.
  • Centralized attack. International registration is subject to the original application or registration within five years from the date the international registration was made. The original application or registration of most New Zealand trademark owners will be considered their application or trademark registration. In the event that the original application is unsuccessful or the initial registration is canceled, the international registration will also terminate. However, there is a provision regarding the transformation of rights under an international registration into a single national application.
  • Narrowing of the granted rights. The dependence of the international registration on the original application implies that any restrictions that apply to the main trademark may affect the rights granted to the owner in the designated states in some way.
  • Property rights. The international registration of the original trademark is unaffected by changes in ownership. Thus, the documentation relating to the change of ownership of a mark must contain the necessary guarantees from the new owner so as not to jeopardize the cancellation or prohibition of the international registration.

How many countries can you embrace? At the discretion of the owner. Depending on the countries required, the cost of filing an application for registration of a national trademark may be slightly more expensive or cheaper. In addition, for some symbols, the more stringent requirements of the Protocol apply in comparison with national requirements.

Will the trademark usage be the same for every country? IR does not change to use each designation, but it is possible to restrict services or goods to some extent to the jurisdiction of a particular country.

What states can you designate? Some jurisdictions offer a greater vulnerability to a right acquired through IR than to a right obtained through national registration. That is why, it is better to refuse to use a universal strategy for registration. Instead, it would be more expedient for companies to resort to the Madrid system, taking into account all its advantages, including lower costs and greater efficiency, which is important for protecting the mark in world markets.

Please note that after Brexit, the UK is no longer designated as the EU on the IR application.

Related insights

Three new Bills will reform financial services regulation in New Zealand

There have been numerous changes in the regulatory framework of New Zealand in the last ten years. Largely, it has been to the conduct and outcomes in the sector. Although, this has made the environment quite complex for firms to navigate, thus increasing operational burdens and costs. Overlapping demands, multiple authorizations, and detailed adherence obligations…

Read more 07.02.2026

Key points about financial markets and services in New Zealand

The fiscal sector in New Zealand is regulated by a sturdy supervisory structure put in place to act as a protective cover for the investor and ensure a well-functioning trading environment. The requirements for providing investment products and giving monetary advice are set out in the FMCA and its related rules, enforced by the FMA….

Read more 06.02.2026

Malta Gaming Licence 2026 – A Comprehensive Guide

In these last years, Gambling concept in Malta has seen a total sea transformation into one of the most respected, solid, and incontrovertibly complete adjustment frameworks for the worldwide iGaming industry. It has managed to establish itself clearly as a prime international operational hub pertinent to people who seek stability, transparency, and market access guarantee….

Read more 05.02.2026

Local Director in Argentina (2026): Residency Rules and Who Can Act as Legal Representative

At the moment, Argentina has a rigid, formal corporate control system. The individual designated to oversee and sign on behalf of the business cannot serve as a figurehead for new investors. Authorities anticipate that someone with legal standing in the nation and the capacity to make actual decisions will occupy this position. Errors at this…

Read more 04.02.2026

MLRO Update 2026: UIF Resolution 3/2026 and the New Freeze-and-Report Workflow

Resolution 3/2026 was made public by the Argentinean UIF earlier this year, 2026. It’s a pack of measures related to the behavior that any executor of the obligated markets need to follow with regards to operations linked to international restriction lists and the flow of prohibited weapon technologies. It doesn’t introduce a whole new tier…

Read more 02.02.2026

Argentina Tax Reporting 2026: What PSPs Must Start Sending to the Tax Authority

General Resolution 5804/2025 was released by the Argentine Ministry of Justice in the Official Gazette at the end of 2025. The document appeared narrow and technical at first. In actuality, it modifies the collection and transmission of financial data linked to digital platforms to the tax authority. The act grants the ARCA more power to…

Read more 30.01.2026

Lithuania grants MiCA CASP authorisations to CoinGate (Decentralized) and Nuvei Liquidity

Lithuania has reinforced its position in the evolving European crypto regulatory landscape by granting two new crypto-asset service provider licences under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). The approvals were issued to CoinGate, operated by UAB Decentralized, and to Nuvei Liquidity, UAB. The decision highlights Lithuania’s increasingly selective approach to crypto regulation and reflects a…

Read more 29.01.2026

Crypto Tax Free Countries 2026

In 2026, crypto-currency taxation is evolving globally and yet rapidly in a streamlined manner. Although digital assets are treatable as property eligible for taxation or financial instruments in most nations, still a larger number of countries strictly enforce zero taxes and bestow a minimal tax rate on crypto. These countries have emerged as the best…

Read more 27.01.2026

How to Get an AEMI License in the UK in 2026

AEMI licence is a permit issued by the UK Financial Conduct Authority to operate as an authorised electronic money institution. This status allows firms to issue electronic money, provide a wide range of payment services and conduct transactions comparable to basic banking functions, with exception of lending and accepting deposits.  In practice, AEMI is often…

Read more 25.01.2026

EMI license in Europe how to choose a country

Electronic money issuer licence in Europe is a permit released by the national financial regulator of a European Union member state to issue electronic money and offer related payment services. It allows you to officially work with electronic balance accounts, issue prepaid products, open customer accounts and make payments within the EU and EEA through…

Read more 24.01.2026

Regulation of payment institutions in the EU country by country differences

Payment institutions are a cornerstone of modern Europe’s economy. They facilitate the transfer of money between people and businesses, in particular the receipt of card payments, operation of online wallets, and delivery of digital financial services without necessarily engaging the services of a full-fledged bank. On the other hand, a common set of rules does…

Read more 23.01.2026

How to Choose a Gaming License: Guide for iGaming

Permission to operate is the first step in any online gambling project. Not branding, not traffic, not design. The platform operates outside of the legal economy in the absence of a state-issued gaming license. This one element is necessary for payments, partnerships, advertising, and financial infrastructure access. Licensing is frequently viewed by founders as supporting…

Read more 22.01.2026