Send us a request and we will contact you as soon as possible.
A regulated fintech operation in the UK requires more preparation than forming a legal entity and putting a product online. Firms executing payment transactions, providing payment initiation services or giving users access to account information may fall within the FCA’s payment services regulation.
The route chosen at the outset affects the structure of the operation, the resources it needs and the range of functions it can provide. In 2026, firms also need to account for changes to safeguarding arrangements and wider supervisory expectations.
Businesses may also search for a PSP license or payment gateway license. In the UK, however, the regulatory position depends on what the business actually does rather than the commercial name attached to the product.
What is a payment institution authorisation in the UK? It is regulatory approval for certain firms carrying out regulated payment functions in the UK.
The principal UK rules are contained in the Payment Services Regulations 2017. They set out categories of payment services, authorisation and registration requirements, and ongoing obligations. The Electronic Money Regulations 2011 are also relevant when a business intends to issue e-money rather than provide payment functions alone.
The distinction between these models is important when deciding which regulatory route is appropriate. For a broader comparison, see the guide to EMI License vs MSB License.
The exact permission depends on what the firm intends to offer. A transfer provider, for example, may fall into a different category from a platform that initiates transactions through another provider.
A firm may need a payment services license when it provides regulated payment offerings in the UK as part of its business activities. The distinction is based on what the firm actually does. A technology provider that only supplies software may fall outside the regulatory perimeter, while a platform that initiates payments or receives funds from users may fall within it. Such providers may apply for registration as enrolled account information service providers rather than seeking full PI authorisation.
Typical examples include:
The legal nature of each feature should be established before choosing the regulatory route.
An organization with a payment provider license can offer different regulated functions depending on the scope approved by the FCA. The main options include:
| Type | Scope |
| Money remittance | Transferring money without creating a payment account in the payer’s or payee’s name |
| Payment initiation services | Initiating a payment order from an account held with another provider |
| Account information services | Providing consolidated access to information from payment accounts held with other payment service providers |
| Other regulated payment offerings | Providing services specified in Schedule 1 to the Payment Services Regulations 2017 |
The permitted scope should reflect what the PI actually intends to offer. A firm combining several functions should define each one clearly when preparing its payment institution application.
The FCA assesses whether the proposed operation is capable of running properly and consistently with the rules.
Key areas normally include:
The FCA also considers whether people responsible for directing the firm have suitable knowledge, experience and reputation.
The submission should explain who performs each important function and how problems are escalated. The product description, organisational chart, forecasts and control arrangements should all describe the same operation.
Where a firm receives relevant funds from payment service users, it must establish appropriate safeguarding arrangements to keep those funds separate from money used for its own operations. This is generally referred to as safeguarding client funds.
The FCA’s safeguarding regime changed on 7 May 2026, making this area particularly relevant to firms preparing for authorisation or reviewing existing arrangements.
A firm should be able to explain:
These procedures need to work in practice rather than exist only as written policies.
The process starts with determining exactly what the firm intends to do. Once the regulatory category is established, the supporting material can be prepared around that scope.
A practical sequence:
The FCA notes that an incomplete submission may not proceed to substantive assessment and recommends practical information such as flow-of-funds diagrams and typical user journeys.
The statutory assessment period is generally three months from receipt of a complete submission. Where the submission is incomplete, the period can extend to 12 months.
The practical timetable can vary. Questions from the FCA, structural changes or missing information can all add time.
The FCA also states that allocation of a case officer can currently take up to 20 working days.
A launch date should therefore leave room for regulatory correspondence.
Yes. Overseas founders can establish and own a local PI, provided the proposed structure satisfies the applicable conditions.
Overseas ownership does not remove the need for a genuine UK presence. The FCA expects an authorised organization to have its head office and registered workplace in the UK and to conduct some relevant work here.
The structure should make clear:
Overseas founders can therefore be involved at ownership level, but the local setup still needs to be credible and workable.
Besides, for founders seeking an existing regulated structure rather than building one from the beginning, acquiring a licensed fintech company may be an option.
In case EMI permission is a decision, the best EMI license jurisdictions should be checked before deciding where to establish wider operation.
Receiving payment institution authorisation is not the end of the regulatory work. An authorised PI has continuing duties covering reporting, own funds, safeguarding, governance, financial crime controls and operational risk.
Technology deserves particular attention as a firm grows. Operational resilience means having arrangements that allow important functions to continue or recover when systems fail, suppliers become unavailable or a security incident affects the operation.
Ongoing oversight may become necessary when the firm:
Payment Institution Authorisation is FCA authorisation allowing a firm to carry out specified regulated payment functions in the UK.
A firm may need this status when it carries out regulated payment functions in the UK as part of its commercial offering.
A PI can provide specified payment services, while an EMI can issue e-money and may also provide payment offerings. The appropriate category depends on the product.
The statutory initial capital criteria are €20,000 for money remittance, €50,000 for payment initiation offerings and €125,000 where the firm provides any of the payment offerings listed in paragraphs (a) to (e) of Schedule 1 to the Payment Services Regulations 2017.
A complete submission is generally subject to a three-month statutory assessment period. An incomplete submission can extend the process to up to 12 months.
Yes. Overseas founders can own a UK PI if the structure meets the conditions and maintains the required presence.
Not automatically. A UK authorisation does not provide automatic EU-wide access, so the rules of the relevant EU jurisdiction must be assessed separately.
Choosing between AEMI and API starts with what customers will do with their money. This UK AEMI vs API comparison explains how that choice affects the launch budget, customer protection and the markets a business can serve. Quick Answer: UK AEMI vs API AEMI allows a UK-regulated firm to issue electronic money and provide payment…
A firm planning to issue e-money in the UK has to choose the right authorisation before setting up its structure. The two main options are an AEMI license UK and an API licence UK. The distinction is straightforward: an AEMI may issue e-money, while an API cannot. An AEMI may also carry out qualifying payment…
The nation has become a relevant European jurisdiction for organizations working with digital assets. Since 2025, the country has operated under the EU’s MiCA regime through the EEA system, with the FMA handling the relevant EEA crypto license. For enterprises considering this particular nation in 2026, the main points are the type of activity, the…
Crypto permission in Germany begins with the services the venture wants to offer. That sounds straightforward, but holding customer assets and running a trading venue are different proposals. Founders examining into a Germany crypto license 2026 project have to settle that point. Then the business plan, managers, AML controls and technology can be put together…
Liechtenstein remains a small but established jurisdiction for international business. Its tax system, access to the EEA market and Swiss franc environment often attract foreign investors. The phrase no property taxes can appear in discussions of tax planning, but the actual tax position depends on the asset and structure. Questions such as what is a…
A ready-made company in Germany can be attractive to an entrepreneur who wants to start operations without going through the full incorporation process from the beginning. A ready-made company may already have its legal structure and registration in place. But when considering how to buy a business, it is important to separate the age of…
It is quite clear that, amongst the making choice of proper lawful form in 2026, Swiss Company Formation is the first preference of a person. The AG, GmbH, and sole proprietorship models are differentiated in country by capital, liability, ownership, and compliance requirements. In short, this solution offers a good compromise for most international entrepreneurs…
Slovakia now adheres to the EU-wide regulatory basis for crypto-asset services. National transition has been concluded on 30 December 2025, and regulated activity now needs MiCA authorization from the National Bank of Slovakia (NBS), unless there is another route permitted by MiCA. A CASP license Slovakia is therefore different from the former VASP registration. Quick…
A regulated fintech operation in the UK requires more preparation than forming a legal entity and putting a product online. Firms executing payment transactions, providing payment initiation services or giving users access to account information may fall within the FCA’s payment services regulation. The route chosen at the outset affects the structure of the operation,…
A pre-established Swiss SRO Licensed Payment & Crypto Company is on sale, providing a triggered SAS LPO appointed legal framework to take a step-forward into Swiss financial, payment, and digital assets markets, already holding a Swiss SRO membership for regulated businesses. Switzerland is among the best jurisdictions for fintech and cryptocurrency companies with its transparent…
Offers are available for a regulated AUSTRAC Digital Currency Exchange &Independent Remittance Dealer business for sale, providing access to Australia’s financial and digital asset exchanges market. For investors seeking a legal foundation already established, it provides faster access to the market than establishing de novo. Why Buy an AUSTRAC compliant business Instead of Registering a…
Choosing between AG and a GmbH is one of the first decisions when establishing a Swiss business. The choice affects available funds, ownership, management and compliance. For business operators considering legal structures in Switzerland, Swiss company formation, how to buy a business or acquiring a ready-made company, the differences should be assessed before entering into…